From c7a38d139987c2a44fa2731ad9d49310e7abc5ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andre Henriques Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:27:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] update-report-comparison-note --- cara/apps/calculator/templates/report.html.j2 | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cara/apps/calculator/templates/report.html.j2 b/cara/apps/calculator/templates/report.html.j2 index 20185fe1..b14518d2 100644 --- a/cara/apps/calculator/templates/report.html.j2 +++ b/cara/apps/calculator/templates/report.html.j2 @@ -173,10 +173,11 @@

Alternative scenarios:

- Notes:
- 1) This graph shows the concentration of viral quanta in the air. The filtration of Type I and FFP2 masks, if worn, applies to individual exposure (inhalation only).
- For this reason, scenarios with different types of mask will show the same concentration on the graph.
- 2) If you have selected more sophisticated options, such as HEPA filtration or FFP2 masks, this will be indicated in the plot as the "base scenario", identical to the main results shown above.
+ # TODO add this Notes section below the plot and have it in a smaller font size than normal text ? + Notes:
+ 1) This graph shows the concentration of infectious quanta in the air. The filtration of Type I and FFP2 masks, if worn, applies not only to the emission rate but also to the individual exposure (i.e. inhalation ).
+ For this reason, scenarios with different types of mask will show the same concentration on the graph but have different Pi values.
+ 2) If you have selected more sophisticated options, such as HEPA filtration or FFP2 masks, this will be indicated in the plot as the "base scenario", representing the inputs inserted in the form.
The other alternative scenarios shown for comparison will not include either HEPA filtration or FFP2 masks.