2012-08-05 09:55:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<h2>Weak Interaction and nuclear decay</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>There are more particles after the decay than just the proton,
|
|
|
|
|
|
there is an electron and a new particle that has not been introduced
|
|
|
|
|
|
yet. This new particle is the neutrino (which is italian and means
|
|
|
|
|
|
“the small neutral one”). As its name suggests, it is electrically
|
|
|
|
|
|
neutral. It has no color charge either, so it does not interact
|
|
|
|
|
|
strongly. It only interacts with this new force, the weak force, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
because the weak force is so weak, it is extremely difficult to
|
|
|
|
|
|
detect. It has been detected, for the first time in 1956, 26 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
after it had been predicted. It also differs from the quarks and the
|
|
|
|
|
|
electron in that its mass has not been measured, it is so light that
|
|
|
|
|
|
there are only upper limits on its mass. The best, up do date limit is
|
|
|
|
|
|
about 1/250 of the mass of the electron.</p>
|
2012-08-05 08:52:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-05 13:32:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<img src="neutron_decay.png">
|
2012-08-05 08:52:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-05 09:55:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<p>This figure shows what happens in the beta decays, the neutron
|
|
|
|
|
|
turns into a proton, an electron and this new particle, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
neutrino. For now the interaction is a “black box”, we know what comes
|
|
|
|
|
|
in and what comes out, but what happens in between?</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>Charged Messengers</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The other forces had messenger particles, the photon[ref] for
|
|
|
|
|
|
electromagnetism and the gluons[ref] for strong interactions, this is
|
|
|
|
|
|
also true for the weak force, and like for the other two forces, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
messenger is a boson[ref]. There is an important difference though,
|
|
|
|
|
|
the messenger particles for the weak force are very heavy, and there
|
|
|
|
|
|
are three of them. Their weight is the reason that this force is so
|
|
|
|
|
|
weak. This sounds counter-intuitive, right? We won’t dive into this,
|
|
|
|
|
|
so if you want to know more, head over here->[READ MORE?]. The
|
|
|
|
|
|
messenger particles are called the W bosons, there are two of them,
|
|
|
|
|
|
one with positive electric charge and one with negative charge, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
there is also a neutral one, which is called Z and which will be
|
|
|
|
|
|
explained later.</p>
|
2012-08-05 08:52:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-05 09:55:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<p>What actually happens in this "black box", is that the neutron
|
|
|
|
|
|
turns into a proton and a [W-] boson, and the [W-] boson decays into
|
|
|
|
|
|
an electron and a neutrino. The W boson is very heavy, its mass is
|
|
|
|
|
|
about 80 times that of the proton, and it will only exist for an
|
|
|
|
|
|
extremely short time (we cannot explain this with what we have
|
|
|
|
|
|
explained so far, but you might want to keep reading until we explain
|
|
|
|
|
|
the second and third generations of matter to understand the short
|
|
|
|
|
|
lifetime of the W). As we know neither the proton nor the neutron is
|
|
|
|
|
|
fundamental, so we can still look closer at the neutron becoming the
|
|
|
|
|
|
proton and the [W-] boson. The neutron is made up of one up-quark and
|
|
|
|
|
|
two down-quarks, and what happens is that one of the down-quarks turns
|
|
|
|
|
|
into an up-quark and the [W-] boson. This is the extent to which the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Model is describing this weak interaction, the down-quark
|
|
|
|
|
|
turning into an up-quark and a [W-] boson and the decay of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
[W-]. These two interactions are “black boxes”, perhaps there is
|
|
|
|
|
|
something more fundamental occurring if one just looks closely enough,
|
|
|
|
|
|
nobody knows that as of today, again this is for someone (maybe you)
|
|
|
|
|
|
to find out! </p>
|
2012-08-05 08:52:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-08-05 09:55:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<p>So far the matter particles that have been introduced are the
|
|
|
|
|
|
electron, the up and down-quarks and the neutrino. The quarks are
|
|
|
|
|
|
connected in that they can interact strongly with each other, and they
|
|
|
|
|
|
are connected to the electron by the electromagnetic force. But the
|
|
|
|
|
|
matter particles are grouped into quarks and leptons, the leptons (so
|
|
|
|
|
|
far) being the electron and the neutrino[[, muon, tau and their
|
|
|
|
|
|
respective neutrino]]. The weak force really gives the connection that
|
|
|
|
|
|
motivates giving the electron and the neutrino this common name,
|
|
|
|
|
|
leptons, as it allows electrons to turn into neutrinos and the other
|
|
|
|
|
|
way around. It also connects the two types of quarks in the same way,
|
|
|
|
|
|
allowing the up-quark to turn into the down-quark as mentioned.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>Neutral messenger and discovery</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The third messenger of the weak force is the Z boson, which is
|
|
|
|
|
|
about as massive as the W bosons, 90 times as massive as the
|
|
|
|
|
|
proton. But unlike the W bosons, it is not charged. Both the Z and the
|
|
|
|
|
|
W bosons were discovered at CERN, and their discovery is one of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
major accomplishments of both CERN and the Standard Model. It is
|
|
|
|
|
|
remarkable because the masses of the particles were predicted, and the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z boson, unlike the W bosons, was not involved in the weak
|
|
|
|
|
|
interactions that were known, [but was a consequence of the theory and
|
|
|
|
|
|
no experiment had seen any indication of its existence when it was
|
|
|
|
|
|
predicted, can you explain this one]. Both the W bosons and the Z
|
|
|
|
|
|
boson were discovered in 1983, and the two persons responsible for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
experiments, Rubbia and van der Meer, got the Nobel prize for this
|
|
|
|
|
|
just one year after the discovery, in 1984. </p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>Outlook</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Is this it? For what we know, yes. What we know by now is
|
|
|
|
|
|
sufficient to explain everything that surrounds us, from the atoms and
|
|
|
|
|
|
nuclei being formed, quarks glued together, down to things as rare and
|
|
|
|
|
|
obscure as nuclear decay and radiation. Is this the whole picture? Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
quite. We have not explained antimatter, and then there are some
|
|
|
|
|
|
really strange particles turning up in cosmic rays. And, in the end,
|
|
|
|
|
|
you might want to learn about the Higgs as well. Read on!</p>
|