cosmicraysandearthquakes/results/homola_replication.json
root 798b0744b5 Fix seismic metric + robustness checks (issues 2a–2d)
2a — Replace physically invalid summed-Mw seismic metric with correct
     log10(ΣE) where E=10^(1.5·Mw+4.8) J (Kanamori 1977).  Updates
     usgs.py (new seismic_energy_per_bin()), scripts 02/07/08.
     Impact: r(+15d) raw 0.310→0.081, peak r 0.469→0.139; sinusoidal
     BF 27.5→0.75 (constant model now preferred).

2b — HP λ derivation: λ_5 = 1600×(365/5)^4 ≈ 4.54×10^10 (Ravn & Uhlig
     2002 rescaling); detrend robustness figure (HP/Butterworth/rolling
     mean), all show r(+15d)<0.04.

2c — Neff comparison: Bartlett 2923, Bretherton 769, Monte Carlo 594;
     MC 95% CI [-0.002, +0.158] straddles zero → raw r not significant
     under most conservative estimate.

2d — Magnitude threshold (M≥4.5/5.0/6.0): r(+15d) range 0.050–0.079
     (Δ=0.029 < 0.05), peak stable at τ=−525 d; no aftershock bias.

Paper (main.tex, refs.bib): update all numbers, add Kanamori/Bartlett/
Ravn–Uhlig refs, new sections for 2b–2d with figures and Neff table.
PDF recompiled (27 pages).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 14:49:54 +02:00

34 lines
No EOL
1 KiB
JSON

{
"script": "scripts/02_homola_replication.py",
"git_sha": "817d7ba",
"seed": 42,
"timestamp_utc": "2026-04-24T12:02:57.512719+00:00",
"study_window": [
"1976-01-01",
"2019-12-31"
],
"bin_days": 5,
"lag_range_days": [
-1000,
1000
],
"min_magnitude": 4.0,
"nmdb_coverage_threshold": 0.6,
"min_stations_requested": 3,
"min_stations_effective": 3,
"n_stations_used": 44,
"n_cr_bins_total": 3215,
"n_cr_bins_valid": 3215,
"cr_data_coverage_pct": 100.03,
"peak_lag_days": -525,
"peak_lag_bins": -105,
"peak_r": 0.138646,
"naive_p_value": 8.079288e-15,
"naive_sigma": 7.766,
"n_pairs_at_peak": 3110,
"r_at_tau_15d": 0.08148,
"p_at_tau_15d": 3.768669e-06,
"sigma_at_tau_15d": 4.624,
"n_lags_scanned": 401,
"note_significance": "Naive p from Pearson t-test treating 5-day bins as i.i.d. Not corrected for: (1) temporal autocorrelation, (2) shared solar-cycle trend, (3) scan over multiple lags. Expected to be grossly over-significant \u2014 corrected tests in phase 2."
}