So far the plugin selected the gcode script corresponding to the number of
extruders configured in the printer profile. After a close look into the
implementation in Cura itself, prompted by #1708, it turns out that this is
in fact wrong.
Cura selects the gcode script to use based on the maximum of the number of
extruders needed for printing the models in the scene and the minimum number
of extruders needed for generating support (if support extruder is "both" or "first"
or there is only one extruder, that's 1, if it's "second" and there is more than one
extruder, it's 2).
This commit changes the plugin's implementation to mirror this implementation.
The difference to Cura is that we have the number of extruders needed for the
models in the scene hard coded to 1 since we only support STL right now which
can never contain more than one object. If we ever decide to support merging of
multiple STLs into one single multi-extruder print or other model files like AMF
or OBJ from OctoPrint's slicer support, we need to change this.
Affected print_temperature and filament_diameter placeholders.
E.g. `print_temperature2` was wrongly attempting to fetch `print_temperatures[2]`
instead of `print_temperatures[1]` (0-based-indexing!)
Partially fixes#1708
* Fix priority queue sorting (sorts ascending, not descending!)
* Abort low priority jobs when a high priority job comes in
* Utilize queue for tracking aborted jobs too
* Abort analysis for items that are to be deleted/moved (also
fixes issue under Windows where it was impossible to delete
a file for which the analysis was still running).
* move hidden login form to the left to hide overlayed
Lastpass context buttons
* do dropdown toggling for login form manually to
not only ignore clicks into form but also into overlayed
Lastpass context buttons for closing the dropdown again;
do close dropdown for included a and button elements
though
* Added/changed mappings of profile to engine settings to
match Cura Legacy mapping:
* perimeterBeforeInfill: taken from perimeter_before_infill (new,
fixes#1693)
* skinSpeed: taken from solidarea_speed (new)
* raftAirGapLayer0: sum of raft_airgap and raft_airgap_all
* raftAirGap: taken from raft_airgap_all (new)
* raftFanSpeed: changed to 0
* raftSurfaceThickness: taken from raft_surface_thickness (new)
* raftSurfaceLinewidth & raftSurfaceLineSpacing: taken from
raft_surface_linewidth (new)
* Mach3 Gcode Flavor replaces S parameter with P parameter in
temperature commands within generated GCODE, like in Cura
Legacy
If the slicer returns values for a tool we want it in our analysis
result, even if it's zero. That way the result will be the same as
if we have our own built in gcode analyser take a look at the
file.
(cherry picked from commit 818ae92)
This fixes the issue that there were no informations about filament
usage in metadata after slicing with cura plugin. Trying to call
profile.get_float("filament_diameter") ended in en exception with
message " 'module' object has no attribute 'get_float' ". So i defined
profile before using profile and now it works.
See issue #1685
Also inserted a check to determine if filament usage is > 0 to exclude
tools with no filament usage in metadata.
(cherry picked from commit c9b38bd)
* Properly handle G0/G1 with no X, Y, Z coordinates in relative mode
instead of duplicating coordinates - should fix#1675
* Only take move commands with X, Y, Z coordinates into account for
model size calculation - this makes our internal GCODE analysis behave
like the GCODE viewer's analysis and produce the same model size. The
downside is that extrusions on the origin are no longer taken into account
for checking if a model is within bounds of the print bed, but that should
hopefully not produce any issues in the real world.
Variables defined in an outer scope can no longer be set from an inner scope (see
pallets/jinja#641). Regardless of whether that is right or wrong, we can't control if
people are using such constructs in their plugins, which versions of Jinja >= 2.9 would
now break out of the blue, regardless of OctoPrint version. That is unacceptable sadly
and requires pinning for now, until plugin authors have had a chance to adapt
accordingly.
Also see #1697.
