Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
root
1d01fcf102 Add seven additional robustness checks (3a–3g) and update paper
3a  Block-bootstrap surrogates (B=804 bins≈11 yr, n=5000): raw r(+15d)
    p=0.022 — marginally significant on undetrended series, driven by
    the shared solar-cycle trend not a causal signal.

3b  Partial correlation (sunspot-regressed, no filter): r(+15d) drops
    from 0.079 to 0.029 (63%) — confirms solar-cycle confounding without
    preprocessing circularity.

3c  Spectral coherence in solar-cycle band = 0.840 (>0.776 threshold);
    kNN mutual information at τ=+15d = 0.000 nats (p=1.000) — no
    nonlinear dependence at the claimed lag.

3d  Missing-data impact: 0% NaN at station thresholds 2/3/5; r(+15d)
    unchanged — missing data is not a confound.

3e  Bin-size sensitivity: dominant peak at τ≈-520d for 1/5/27-day bins;
    r at +15d scales with bin size (solar-cycle leakage, not physical).

3f  GK declustering removes 28.4% of events as aftershocks; r(+15d)
    changes by only Δ=0.014 — aftershock clustering not a confound.

3g  Per-solar-cycle analysis (cycles 21–24): r(+15d) all positive
    (0.018–0.073) but dominant peak lags scattered (-65/-125/+125/-125d)
    — phase-drifting solar-cycle artefact, not physical precursor.

Script fixes: vectorised block bootstrap (401×5000 → NumPy matmul),
  kNN MI with sorted searchsorted (O(N log N), no inflated values),
  coherence nperseg 512→2048 (resolves solar-cycle band), axhspan→axvspan.

Paper: new Methods subsections (block bootstrap, partial correlation,
  nonlinear dependence); new Results subsections for each check; updated
  Conclusions with 7-item robustness summary; Kraskov2004 and
  GardnerKnopoff1974 added to refs.bib; Homola2023 updated to arXiv
  preprint 2204.12310; eq:energy duplicate label fixed. PDF: 35 pages.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 20:43:08 +02:00
root
798b0744b5 Fix seismic metric + robustness checks (issues 2a–2d)
2a — Replace physically invalid summed-Mw seismic metric with correct
     log10(ΣE) where E=10^(1.5·Mw+4.8) J (Kanamori 1977).  Updates
     usgs.py (new seismic_energy_per_bin()), scripts 02/07/08.
     Impact: r(+15d) raw 0.310→0.081, peak r 0.469→0.139; sinusoidal
     BF 27.5→0.75 (constant model now preferred).

2b — HP λ derivation: λ_5 = 1600×(365/5)^4 ≈ 4.54×10^10 (Ravn & Uhlig
     2002 rescaling); detrend robustness figure (HP/Butterworth/rolling
     mean), all show r(+15d)<0.04.

2c — Neff comparison: Bartlett 2923, Bretherton 769, Monte Carlo 594;
     MC 95% CI [-0.002, +0.158] straddles zero → raw r not significant
     under most conservative estimate.

2d — Magnitude threshold (M≥4.5/5.0/6.0): r(+15d) range 0.050–0.079
     (Δ=0.029 < 0.05), peak stable at τ=−525 d; no aftershock bias.

Paper (main.tex, refs.bib): update all numbers, add Kanamori/Bartlett/
Ravn–Uhlig refs, new sections for 2b–2d with figures and Neff table.
PDF recompiled (27 pages).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 14:49:54 +02:00
root
817d7ba042 Add raw pairwise correlation analysis (script 09) and paper section
New script 09_raw_pairwise_correlations.py downloads OOS NMDB/USGS data
and computes Pearson r and Spearman ρ (with Bonferroni correction) for
all three variable pairs across in-sample, OOS, and combined windows.
CR flux is represented by its per-bin station distribution (p5–p95 band
with min–max overlay); seismic energy uses the physically correct
E ∝ 10^(1.5·Mw) sum; sunspots shown with 365-day smoothed + raw spread.

Key findings: CR vs sunspot r=-0.82 to -0.94 (Forbush decrease); CR vs
seismicity r=0.057 raw (OOS: r=0.046, not significant); confounding
triangle motivates HP-filter detrending analysis.

Paper gains a new Section 4.1 "Raw Pairwise Correlations" with three
scatter figures and a 9-test Bonferroni summary table; 24 pages total.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 13:45:50 +02:00
root
9c226807c1 Add OOS and combined analysis results (scripts 07-08)
Out-of-sample (2020-2025): r(+15d)=+0.045, p=0.994 — not significant.
Combined (1976-2025): p=0.039 (2.1σ), sinusoid P=9.95 yr, BF=27.5.
Bayes factor strongly favours solar-cycle modulation over a constant,
confirming the correlation is driven by the shared ~10-year solar cycle
rather than a causal CR→seismic mechanism.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 07:34:24 +02:00
root
abf00b89f4 Add analysis results: scripts 01-05 outputs
Benchmark, Homola replication, stress test, detrended analysis, and
geographic localisation results including figures. Pre-registration
and data availability already committed separately.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 00:45:17 +02:00