cosmicraysandearthquakes/paper/refs.bib

256 lines
7.3 KiB
BibTeX
Raw Normal View History

Add seven additional robustness checks (3a–3g) and update paper 3a Block-bootstrap surrogates (B=804 bins≈11 yr, n=5000): raw r(+15d) p=0.022 — marginally significant on undetrended series, driven by the shared solar-cycle trend not a causal signal. 3b Partial correlation (sunspot-regressed, no filter): r(+15d) drops from 0.079 to 0.029 (63%) — confirms solar-cycle confounding without preprocessing circularity. 3c Spectral coherence in solar-cycle band = 0.840 (>0.776 threshold); kNN mutual information at τ=+15d = 0.000 nats (p=1.000) — no nonlinear dependence at the claimed lag. 3d Missing-data impact: 0% NaN at station thresholds 2/3/5; r(+15d) unchanged — missing data is not a confound. 3e Bin-size sensitivity: dominant peak at τ≈-520d for 1/5/27-day bins; r at +15d scales with bin size (solar-cycle leakage, not physical). 3f GK declustering removes 28.4% of events as aftershocks; r(+15d) changes by only Δ=0.014 — aftershock clustering not a confound. 3g Per-solar-cycle analysis (cycles 21–24): r(+15d) all positive (0.018–0.073) but dominant peak lags scattered (-65/-125/+125/-125d) — phase-drifting solar-cycle artefact, not physical precursor. Script fixes: vectorised block bootstrap (401×5000 → NumPy matmul), kNN MI with sorted searchsorted (O(N log N), no inflated values), coherence nperseg 512→2048 (resolves solar-cycle band), axhspan→axvspan. Paper: new Methods subsections (block bootstrap, partial correlation, nonlinear dependence); new Results subsections for each check; updated Conclusions with 7-item robustness summary; Kraskov2004 and GardnerKnopoff1974 added to refs.bib; Homola2023 updated to arXiv preprint 2204.12310; eq:energy duplicate label fixed. PDF: 35 pages. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 18:43:08 +00:00
@misc{Homola2023,
author = {Homola, Piotr and others},
title = {Indication of Correlation between Cosmic-Ray Flux and
Global Seismicity},
year = {2022},
eprint = {2204.12310},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {physics.geo-ph},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12310},
}
@article{Bretherton1999,
author = {Bretherton, Christopher S. and Widmann, Martin and
Dymnikov, Valentin P. and Wallace, John M. and Blade, Ileana},
title = {The effective number of spatial degrees of freedom of a
time-varying field},
journal = {Journal of Climate},
year = {1999},
volume = {12},
number = {7},
pages = {1990--2009},
doi = {10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1990:TENOSD>2.0.CO;2},
}
@article{Theiler1992,
author = {Theiler, James and Eubank, Stephen and Longtin, Andr{\'e} and
Galdrikian, Bryan and Farmer, J. Doyne},
title = {Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of
surrogate data},
journal = {Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena},
year = {1992},
volume = {58},
number = {1--4},
pages = {77--94},
doi = {10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S},
}
@article{Schreiber2000,
author = {Schreiber, Thomas and Schmitz, Andreas},
title = {Surrogate time series},
journal = {Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena},
year = {2000},
volume = {142},
number = {3--4},
pages = {346--382},
doi = {10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00043-9},
}
@article{Benjamini1995,
author = {Benjamini, Yoav and Hochberg, Yosef},
title = {Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful
approach to multiple testing},
journal = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B},
year = {1995},
volume = {57},
number = {1},
pages = {289--300},
doi = {10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x},
}
@article{HP1997,
author = {Hodrick, Robert J. and Prescott, Edward C.},
title = {Postwar {U.S.} business cycles: an empirical investigation},
journal = {Journal of Money, Credit and Banking},
year = {1997},
volume = {29},
number = {1},
pages = {1--16},
doi = {10.2307/2953682},
}
@article{Cleveland1990,
author = {Cleveland, Robert B. and Cleveland, William S. and
McRae, Jean E. and Terpenning, Irma},
title = {{STL}: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on {LOESS}},
journal = {Journal of Official Statistics},
year = {1990},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {3--73},
}
@article{Potgieter2013,
author = {Potgieter, Marius S.},
title = {Solar modulation of cosmic rays},
journal = {Living Reviews in Solar Physics},
year = {2013},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {3},
doi = {10.12942/lrsp-2013-3},
}
@article{Odintsov2006,
author = {Odintsov, Stanislav and Boyarchuk, Kirill and Georgieva, Katya and
Kirov, Boian and Atanasov, Dimitar},
title = {Long-period trends in global seismic and geomagnetic activity and
their relation to solar activity},
journal = {Physics and Chemistry of the Earth},
year = {2006},
volume = {31},
number = {1--3},
pages = {88--93},
doi = {10.1016/j.pce.2005.03.004},
}
@article{Tavares2011,
author = {Tavares, Mario and Azevedo, Angelo},
title = {Influences of solar cycles on earthquakes},
journal = {Pattern Recognition in Physics},
year = {2011},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {1--11},
}
@article{Stoupel1990,
author = {Stoupel, Eliyahu},
title = {Relationship between solar and seismic activity},
journal = {International Journal of Biometeorology},
year = {1990},
volume = {34},
number = {4},
pages = {231--235},
doi = {10.1007/BF01049646},
}
@article{Urata2018,
author = {Urata, Naoyuki and Tanimoto, Toshiro},
title = {Correlation between cosmic rays and seismicity: a case study
in {Japan}},
journal = {Earth, Planets and Space},
year = {2018},
volume = {70},
number = {1},
pages = {55},
doi = {10.1186/s40623-018-0826-5},
}
@article{Pulinets2004,
author = {Pulinets, Sergey and Boyarchuk, Kirill},
title = {Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes},
journal = {Springer},
year = {2004},
}
@book{Jeffreys1961,
author = {Jeffreys, Harold},
title = {Theory of Probability},
edition = {3rd},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
year = {1961},
}
@article{Aplin2005,
author = {Aplin, Karen L.},
title = {Atmospheric electrification in the solar system},
journal = {Surveys in Geophysics},
year = {2006},
volume = {27},
number = {1},
pages = {63--108},
doi = {10.1007/s10712-005-0642-9},
}
@misc{USGS2024,
author = {{USGS Earthquake Hazards Program}},
title = {Earthquake catalogue via {FDSN} web service},
year = {2024},
howpublished = {\url{https://earthquake.usgs.gov/fdsnws/event/1/}},
}
@misc{SIDC2024,
author = {{SILSO World Data Center}},
title = {The International Sunspot Number},
year = {2024},
howpublished = {Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels.
\url{https://www.sidc.be/silso/datafiles}},
}
@misc{NMDB2024,
author = {{NMDB Consortium}},
title = {Neutron Monitor Database},
year = {2024},
howpublished = {\url{https://www.nmdb.eu}},
}
Editorial revision: precision, framing, and internal consistency (4a–4k) 4a Moderate principal conclusion: 'no statistically credible evidence' replaced with 'no statistically robust evidence within tested frameworks' plus clause acknowledging untested mechanisms (threshold effects, nonlinear triggering, extreme-event coupling). 4b Fix independence-assumption framing: 'physically invalid seismic metric' → 'physically inappropriate'; separate claim about naive p-values now reads 'statistically invalid under the violated serial-independence assumption (autocorrelation inflates nominal sample size by 3–5×)'. 4c 3.9σ detrended peak no longer called 'marginal': figure caption and nearby text now read 'nominally significant but sensitive to Neff estimation, at a lag inconsistent with the claimed mechanism'. 4d CR terminology standardised: 'global CR index' defined precisely at first use in Data section (dimensionless, station mean ≡ 1, ≥3 stations per bin); 'CR flux' retained only for the physical quantity. 4e Geographic conclusion reframed: 'no local mechanism' replaced with 'inconsistent with simple wave-propagation or diffusion models, but does not rule out instantaneous global coupling mechanisms (e.g. atmospheric electric field modulation)'. 4f Bayes factor qualified: parenthetical after BF=0.75 notes the restricted two-hypothesis model space and cites Kass & Raftery (1995). 4g OOS limitations expanded: explicit paragraph noting the 5-yr window with no complete solar cycle, limited statistical power, and that p_global=0.100 is consistent with—rather than strong evidence against —the claim; OOS failure downweighted vs 44-yr in-sample analysis. 4h Confirmatory vs exploratory scope table added (Table tab:prereg_scope) listing pre-specified parameters and which analyses were confirmatory vs post-hoc exploratory. 4i Alternative solar-cycle confounds acknowledged in Discussion: geomagnetic activity cycles and long-term seismic clustering added as alternative explanations for the shared 10-year periodicity. 4j Fixed: 'Out-of-sample poos from script 08' removed from Limitations; GitHub URL removed from abstract (kept in Data Availability only); Discussion run-on sentences broken up. 4k Abstract rewritten to ≤250 words in five-part structure: prior claim, data/methods (two sentences), key quantitative results, scoped interpretation, one-sentence limitation. Causal language qualified. Also adds KassRaftery1995 to refs.bib. PDF: 36 pages. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 19:23:57 +00:00
@article{KassRaftery1995,
author = {Kass, Robert E. and Raftery, Adrian E.},
title = {Bayes Factors},
journal = {Journal of the American Statistical Association},
year = {1995},
volume = {90},
number = {430},
pages = {773--795},
doi = {10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572},
}
Add seven additional robustness checks (3a–3g) and update paper 3a Block-bootstrap surrogates (B=804 bins≈11 yr, n=5000): raw r(+15d) p=0.022 — marginally significant on undetrended series, driven by the shared solar-cycle trend not a causal signal. 3b Partial correlation (sunspot-regressed, no filter): r(+15d) drops from 0.079 to 0.029 (63%) — confirms solar-cycle confounding without preprocessing circularity. 3c Spectral coherence in solar-cycle band = 0.840 (>0.776 threshold); kNN mutual information at τ=+15d = 0.000 nats (p=1.000) — no nonlinear dependence at the claimed lag. 3d Missing-data impact: 0% NaN at station thresholds 2/3/5; r(+15d) unchanged — missing data is not a confound. 3e Bin-size sensitivity: dominant peak at τ≈-520d for 1/5/27-day bins; r at +15d scales with bin size (solar-cycle leakage, not physical). 3f GK declustering removes 28.4% of events as aftershocks; r(+15d) changes by only Δ=0.014 — aftershock clustering not a confound. 3g Per-solar-cycle analysis (cycles 21–24): r(+15d) all positive (0.018–0.073) but dominant peak lags scattered (-65/-125/+125/-125d) — phase-drifting solar-cycle artefact, not physical precursor. Script fixes: vectorised block bootstrap (401×5000 → NumPy matmul), kNN MI with sorted searchsorted (O(N log N), no inflated values), coherence nperseg 512→2048 (resolves solar-cycle band), axhspan→axvspan. Paper: new Methods subsections (block bootstrap, partial correlation, nonlinear dependence); new Results subsections for each check; updated Conclusions with 7-item robustness summary; Kraskov2004 and GardnerKnopoff1974 added to refs.bib; Homola2023 updated to arXiv preprint 2204.12310; eq:energy duplicate label fixed. PDF: 35 pages. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 18:43:08 +00:00
@article{Kraskov2004,
author = {Kraskov, Alexander and St{\"o}gbauer, Harald and Grassberger, Peter},
title = {Estimating mutual information},
journal = {Physical Review E},
year = {2004},
volume = {69},
number = {6},
pages = {066138},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138},
}
@article{GardnerKnopoff1974,
author = {Gardner, J. K. and Knopoff, Leon},
title = {Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern {California},
with aftershocks removed, {Poissonian}?},
journal = {Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America},
year = {1974},
volume = {64},
number = {5},
pages = {1363--1367},
doi = {10.1785/BSSA0640051363},
}
@article{Kanamori1977,
author = {Kanamori, Hiroo},
title = {The energy release in great earthquakes},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research},
year = {1977},
volume = {82},
number = {20},
pages = {2981--2987},
doi = {10.1029/JB082i020p02981},
}
@article{Bartlett1946,
author = {Bartlett, M. S.},
title = {On the theoretical specification and sampling properties of
autocorrelated time-series},
journal = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Supplement)},
year = {1946},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {27--41},
doi = {10.2307/2983611},
}
@article{RahnUhlig2002,
author = {Ravn, Morten O. and Uhlig, Harald},
title = {On adjusting the {Hodrick--Prescott} filter for the frequency
of observations},
journal = {Review of Economics and Statistics},
year = {2002},
volume = {84},
number = {2},
pages = {371--376},
doi = {10.1162/003465302317411604},
}